TFIOS; Not so bright // An “okay” review

Tags

, , , , ,

When I read the the preview of John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars at the back of Paper Towns, I was immediately ecstatic to read it. I thought, Finally! A female protagonist! No more accolades of perfect girls with intelligent minds and sexy bods!1 I also got more excited upon hearing my friends’ positive comments about this book. Tumblr did its part too, teasing me with various quotes and snippets from the novel. But alas, I had to wait for Christmas to read it. It costs about P700! And no way was I spending almost 4/5s of my allowance. So in the meantime, I got hyped up.

Randomly, I saw this post on my dashboard (I think it was John Green who even reblogged it, though I can’t be sure.) saying how Green’s writings are pretentious and “Teens don’t really talk that way!” and he replies with something like Deal with it or I don’t care. I’ve only read Looking for Alaska and Paper Towns, but then I’d have to agree, his writing is a bit pretentious (more on this later), but as for the latter, well, I don’t believe that teens can’t talk smart.

Anyway, after waiting for months (and refraining from downloading an ebook, because I knew this book would be worth the wait, and the trees cut to use as paper), I finally got my own copy.

tfioss

UNPOPULAR OPINION AHEAD.

The Fault in Our Stars is said to be John Green’s best novel to date. There was – there is – hype about this book but after reading it, well, I thought it was overhyped – not overrated, I still think it’s a good book to read, but I guess TFIOS didn’t meet my expectations. I expected a really great story line (check), unforgettable characters (not really) and tears (none).

So the story was “okay”. I applaud John Green for making intelligent Young Adult novels. I find his novels (though I admit I’ve only read three of them) a bit formulaic though – in terms of character design and a few elements of the story2. Like all John Green books, there are many literary references. I thought the use of the title in reference to Shakespeare and the term “star-crossed lovers” was ingenious of him. With TFIOS, I think Green tried to give a “deep” and insightful book, while at the same time making it readable for Young Adults – though some parts are really… ugh, the use of highfalutin words paired with poetry-like construction of sentences are just… unbelievable and a bit inappropriate for everyday conversation.3 And yes, this is the part that I admit I find his writing a bit pretentious. Because of the formula: “Smart” and well-read (and aesthetically-pleasing, when it comes to the girls) characters stuck in a situation which they try to overcome whilst spouting quotable quotes (Great lines though)

tumblr_m9ul9bskhg1qjhzvpo2_250

tumblr_m8oilfXXDB1qax3b4o1_1280 tumblr_m8oilfXXDB1qax3b4o2_250tumblr_m8ux09Jt0D1qax3b4o1_500

Images from http://rocketrictic.tumblr.com/

Story-wise, well, the whole sick person loves sick person isn’t all that original to me. I couldn’t help but compare it to JD Allen’s Six Feet From Paradise (too bad it’s not available online anymore, I’m still waiting for it to get published because I seriously LOVE this novel.), one that made me bawl and sad for, like, a week after reading it.

But I digress. I wasn’t “emotionally attached” to the characters in this novel. Since it mostly revolved around the two protagonists/lovers, both of which I found “okay”, I wasn’t at all touched by their love story (this is the part where people start throwing tomatoes at me). Overall, I liked reading Paper Towns (especially) and Looking for Alaska more because other characters were “more involved” in the story… and when it comes to John Green books, I realize that I like the supporting characters more than the protagonists themselves. I especially didn’t like the use of tumblrisms in this novel! (And I’m still trying to figure out why.) The use of exaggeration, the “adjective noun IS adjective” line… yeah, I didn’t like it being used in the book for some reason. But what I was really peeved about was the substitution of “always” to “okay.” Not really substitution but the use and reference of it…  I thought it was a bit sacrilegious4 And I don’t really understand why. Yes, I guess it’s a witty thing to do… but there’s still something about it that annoys me a bit.

On the other hand, I loved the idea that everyone is obsessed with, and I quote, “leaving marks upon the world, bequeathing a legacy and outlasting death.” I liked that this story of, well, sickness and death, explored the idea of wanting to be remarkable, of being remembered after you die, in a very realistic manner – not everyone lives an extraordinary life. Extraordinary in a way that you are remembered in history. But this novel teaches us how people can be remarkable to those who knew them. It’s not the whole world, but it’s what we get.

Overall, this novel is a good read. I was bit disappointed, yes, but I was glad I read it all the same. John Green is a great Young Adult writer. His novels are original (I’ve had enough of YA romance please), well-written (quotable quotes galore!) and insightful. I guess I just expected something more from him for this (hyped up) novel.

(But his writing does seem pretentious at times.)

1 Because seriously, one of the things I disliked reading about Green are his beautiful and broken heroines who, at first, couldn’t give a crap about the lovelorn protagonist.

2 Perhaps that’s why I wasn’t so awed by TFIOS. I expected something more, something new from John Green (he used a female narrator this time!) but what he gave was well, still at par with his other works. It’s like watching Captain Jack Sparrow in the 4th Pirates movie. He’s still the same amazing character but then his actions and words become repetitive and you know he’s going to give a witty remark or make an elaborate, yet casual, escape.

3 But I guess he wants his characters to speak that way so… whatever. /kanyeshrug. Probably trying to widen the vocabulary of readers.

4 Clearly, and I will stand by this, it was a reference to the use of “Always” in Harry Potter and The Hunger Games.

cringe; 2012 booklist

Tags

, ,

This is the first time I felt embarrassed of my book list. Not only did I not finish the 50 books per year challenge, I splurged on YA ebooks this year! Which could only mean one thing: an abundance of candy fiction.

As usual, the ones in BOLD are the good reads. Which as you can see, are so very few. The good ones are those that I either extremely enjoyed reading or didn’t 100% like but I was glad I read it anyway.

  1. River Secrets – Shannon Hale
  2. Fade – Lisa McMann
  3. Archenemy – Frank Beddor
  4. Matched – Ally Condie
  5. Girl with a Pearl Earring – Tracy Chevalier
  6. Dead Gorgeous – Malorie Blackman
  7. The Great Call of China – Cynthea Liu
  8. His Eyes – Renee Carter
  9. Good Omens – Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett
  10. The Winter Ghosts – Kate Mosse
  11. The Beckoning Hills – Ruth Elwin Harris
  12. A Sensible Life – Mary Wesley
  13. Peter Pan – J.M. Barrie
  14. Being Nikki – Meg Cabot
  15. Runaway – Meg Cabot
  16. How to Kill a Rockstar – Tiffannie DeBartolo
  17. The Mysterious Benedict Society and the Prisoner’s Dilemma – Trenton Lee Stewart
  18. Daughter of Venice – Donna Jo Napoli
  19. The Bloody Chamber – Angela Carter
  20. The Iron King – Julie Kagawa
  21. Winter’s Passage - Julie Kagawa
  22. The Iron Daughter – Julie Kagawa
  23. Keys to the Repository – Melissa de la Cruz
  24. Summer’s Crossing – Julie Kagawa
  25. Keys to the Repository – Melissa De La Cruz
  26. Menfreya in the Morning – Victoria Holt
  27. The Splendor Falls – Rosemary Clement-Moore
  28. Marco’s Pendulum – Thom Madley
  29. Crossed – Ally Condie
  30. The Lady and the Unicorn - Tracy Chevalier
  31. Artemis Fowl and The Last Guardian – Eoin Colfer
  32. Jane – April Lindner
  33. Looking for Alaska – John Green
  34. 13 Little Blue Envelopes – Maureen Johnson
  35. The Last Little Blue Envelope – Maureen Johnson
  36. What About Goodbye – Sarah Dessen
  37. Paper Towns – John Green
  38. Size 12 and Ready to Rock – Meg Cabot
  39. On the Jellicoe Road – Melina Marchetta
  40. The Ghost and the Goth – Stacey Kade
  41. Queen of the Dead – Stacey Kade
  42. Body and Soul - Stacey Kade
  43. Fresh Off the Boat – Melissa de la Cruz
  44. Lucia, Lucia - Adriana Trigiani
  45. Juliet Immortal – Stacey Jay
  46. Romeo Redeemed – Stacey Jay
  47. The Red Garden – Alice Hoffman
  48. The Fault in Our Stars – John Green
  49. Tiger Lily – Jodi Lynn Anderson

* Does not include the fanfics, short stories and fictionpress stories I’ve read this year.

With that, I’ve decided to change my reading habits for this year. Still doing the 50 books but aside from that, I need to read at least 20 “good books” That means less candy fiction, more literature.

Besides, I’m turning 20 this year. I think I need to read those apt for my age.

Another book-related resolution: Never procrastinate book wrapping ever again. Well, at least not to this point where I had to cover about 15 books in one sitting.

books

It was not good for the books or for me either.

Gauging “Crazy”

Tags

, , , , ,

The first album that I ever put in my 6-year-old iPod is Boys Like Girls’ debut album. I loved all the songs and had all of them memorized. Six years ago, I declared that they are my most favorite band of all time.

Three years ago, I wrote an article about Boys Like Girl’s sophomore album, Love Drunk. I didn’t claim to be music critic or expert, I just wrote of what I thought about it. Considering I was a fan, it was a pretty positive album review – even though I remember writing that I liked the first album better. I thought it sounded less “alternative” and more “pop”, but I didn’t mind because their songs were still distinctly recognizable. It was different, but I still liked them, though it could never compare to their first.

Until now, both albums are still in my iPod.

After a three year hiatus, Boys Like Girls are back with their third album, “Crazy World”. When “Be Your Everything” was released, I immediately went, well, crazy over it. It sounded like something off “Love Drunk” and not “Boys Like Girls”, but that’s okay. I was ecstatic to hear more of Martin Johnson’s vocals and songs. “The First Time” and “Life of the Party” were released next, and though I wasn’t as receptive of it as the first one, I thought they sounded okay. “The First Time” reminded me of a cross between “She’s Got A Boyfriend” and “The First One”, both of which I liked in Love Drunk. “Life of the Party” sounded completely new, and I can’t help but cringe at the thought of comparing it to Hannah Montana’s ”Hoedown Throwdown”, sort of a perky, country song.

It took me some time to get used to. And after listening to their new album “Crazy World”, I’m not so sure if I could really get used to this – once again – repackaged Boys Like Girls.

A few of the songs, I really didn’t like. It seemed so different from their original style that if I heard it on the radio, I wouldn’t have guessed it was them. “Shoot” was one of them. Martin’s voice was a bit unrecognizable. The first thing that came to mind was “old cowboy” – don’t ask me why. “Hey You” had the same flavor, his voice was heavily accented and I didn’t like it because Martin’s voice is one of the reasons why I love the songs of this band. I guess I’d prefer their perky country songs like “Life of the Party” than emo songs like “Hey You.” “Cheated” was just really disappointing. It seems like a song that any pop artist would sing.  Cause I know, you cheated on me, you cheated on me woah-oh Umm, what happened to the amazing lyrics that I love? What happened to creativity? What happened to “Your voice was the soundtrack of my summer”?

Martin Johnson’s voice seemed to have changed, adopting a bit of country accent. “Stuck in the Middle” is one of their “new” songs which I thought is good, even though I had mixed feelings at the beginning of the song, the chorus was the redeeming factor – from the instrumentals to his voice. The boys have changed from their usual drums and guitars and have added new instruments, like the piano intro of “Leaving California”, another “new” song that I liked – great lyrics, nice melody and good vocals. “Take Me Home” is “in between song” – a cross of the flavor of this album and Love Drunk, though I don’t think I’m a fan of the repetition in the chorus – similarly done in “Be Your Everything”. It seems that it’s only in “Be Your Everything” does Martin Johnson truly sound like himself, or similar to their previous albums. The tune of the song makes it seem like it could’ve come from their second album, which is probably why it’s the one that appealed to me the most.

Truthfully, I was disappointed with Crazy World. Until now, I’ve loved every single one of their songs but like a said, these new songs, this “new” band would take some time to get used to. I really thought “Boys Like Girls are back”, but they’ve had a drastic makeover. At this moment, I’m seriously reconsidering the title “most favorite band of all time”. That or, I just put a time limit.

Boys Like Girls’ Crazy World is crazy. And crazy was never a neutral word, ranging from ridiculousness to devotion. Right now, I’m leaning on bizarre.

 

For never was a story of more woe

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

It’s a rare occasion that I write a review on a novel I read as an e-book. Usually because most of the e-books I download are candy fiction and not worth writing about (in my opinion). But I’ve made an exception for this one. Not because I particularly loved it like this mistaken candy fiction, but because the story roused many emotions from me after reading it.

“These violent delights have violent ends
And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,
Which as they kiss consume.”
—Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare

The premise of Stacey Jay’s Juliet Immortal is that the greatest love story ever told was lie. Romeo betrayed Juliet to gain power and immortality but his plan also caused Juliet to become immortal as well. Romeo now serves the Mercenaries who take power from killing “soul mates”, while Juliet belongs with the Ambassadors whose mission is to protect these soul mates. For many centuries, Romeo and Juliet inhabit the bodies of different humans in order for them to do their duties. They always meet at swords’ point – Juliet, fueled by hate and betrayal, and Romeo, twisted by the darkness, determined to kill her.

The plot intrigued me. There are countless of retellings and spin-offs of classics nowadays, but this is the first time I’ve encountered that put two lovers against each other. Some of the stories I’ve read only take liberties with the time and roles1. However, Juliet Immortal veered away from Shakespeare’s tragedy, only taking basic elements – the main characters.  In fact, you could even regard this story as more of a continuation rather than a retelling since it assumes that the death of the characters is the start of this book’s narrative. Jay’s Juliet even claims that Shakespeare’s play was a lie and merely glamorized death of lovers, which worked to the advantage of the Mercenaries.

So with a plot like that, I thought that this would be an interesting and satisfactory read. How wrong I was.

Spoilers ahead.

Juliet narrates the entire book, except for a few “Intermezzo” chapters as told by Romeo. The first few chapters got me hooked because it didn’t waste time on preliminaries and is fast-paced.

“Has anyone ever told you your hair looks silver in the moonlight?”

I glance in the rearview mirror. My new hair does look silver, like something from a fairy tale. And the rest of what I can see of myself is equally haunting—shocking, really.

Why does Ariel think herself so repulsive? Huge blue eyes dominate my new face, dwarfing my small nose and thin lips. The scars on my cheek and jaw are visible, but they aren’t as terrible as Ariel thinks. The face looking back at me is attractive, compelling. There’s something about it that makes you want to look twice.

So I do, staring a little too long, giving myself away.

Dylan laughs, his lips suddenly far too close to mine.

“But soft, what light through yonder window breaks?”

No. It can’t be. We’ve never— He’s never—

“Did you miss me, love?” He kisses me on the cheek, a rough, playful kiss that leaves a bit of wet behind.

Dylan has died after all. And Romeo has found a corpse. It’s my last thought before his hands are around my throat.

But then there’s the inevitable fault in most Young Adult novels – the immediate falling-in-love. No, not with Romeo but with a stranger (of course as the cliche goes, we later find out that he’s connected to her in some way, via her best friend) who helped her. He’s Ben, and they fall in love within three days. Clearly, Juliet is afflicted with the love at first sight syndrome – though she says she doesn’t believe it, it has happened to her twice already.

Then comes the angst – she thought Ben was her best friend’s soul mate and it’s her duty to keep them together (but, again, as the cliche goes, he is in love with her, pitiful Juliet, and not with his supposed soul mate) Of course, Romeo comes in to spread gloom and doom as is his role, but honestly? I found his parts, his plot more interesting than Juliet’s, who’s supposed to be this badass, hell-hath-no-fury-like-a-woman-scorned type of heroine but falls with the other YA female protagonists: lovesick and lovelorn. Romeo was a hard character to figure out. He’s remarkable and pathetic at the same time, and his “angst” seems less superficial than Juliet’s love life dilemma.

But I’ll admit, the first few scenes with Juliet and Ben had me rooting for them, partially because Juliet was so messed up and Ben was clearly the knight in shining armor type. But as the story progresses and they become more clingy and obsessed with each other, I found myself skimming through the lines wanting for it to all end. This version of Juliet is also so indecisive! I love you Ben. No we can’t be together. Let me just stay with you for a while. No! Though aside from her emotional inconsistencies, the narration was good and filled with emotion. Albeit too much emotion for my liking.

Like with Maureen Johnson’s 13 Little Blue Envelopes, I expected a novel full of  bold experiences and a heroine that is headstrong. Instead, I get a story centered on romance (and not because Romeo and Juliet’s mission is to destroy/save soul mates) and a protagonist that is easily swayed and changed by the possibility of love. I even think the story would be better if it focused on Juliet’s animosity towards Romeo. That would be a change.

I especially disliked how it all ended. It all seemed like a forced happy ending – which is probably the case since suddenly, there were two universes in the story. I wasn’t swayed by the twist in the ending. Juliet wakes up in her old body in fair Verona, alive and well, and meets Benvolio, Romeo’s cousin, who turns out to be Ben. I didn’t find it clever at all. I even thought it was annoying, for some reason. In a way, this novel is a tragedy because of the unsatisfying conclusion for a supposed fascinating retelling.

I downloaded the sequel Romeo Redeemed the same time as I’ve downloaded Juliet Immortal. Obviously, that book focuses on Romeo now. I’m not sure whether I’m going to read it, though I admit that Romeo is probably the only character I liked (and “hated”, because he’s the villain – but I liked him as a villain) from beginning to end in the novel. Hopefully it would be better than its predecessor.


… than this of Juliet and her Romeo.

1 Like April Lindner’s retelling of Brontë’s Jane Eyre, Jane, where Edward Rochester becomes a rockstar. The plot remains fairly the same, and some of the lines were reworded to make it sound more modern, but that was it basically.

a tale told by an idiot

Tags

, ,

… full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

“If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking.” – Haruki Murakami

It’s November and because of the dengue two weeks ago, I haven’t joined in NaNoWriMo… again. Instead, I’ve been devouring ebooks like mad. I only resort to them when I have no money to buy new books (which is often) But the thing about the ebooks I read is that they’re… unhealthy. Candy fiction, I mean. More fluff, less substance. Usually Young Adult novels. The kind of books I wouldn’t spend P300+ on, or those that I won’t reread or I’d proudly display on my shelf.  I’m only bothering to read these books because I have nothing else to do. And even though the books I want to read are also available as ebooks, there are some that I’ve decided, I can only read in bound paper. They’re too good to be mere megabytes in my laptop. Most of these ebooks are read just for the sake of adding another book to my yearly book list – and my 2012 one looks awful. There are only a few notable reads, and I haven’t found the book (series) that would change my year (in 2009 it was Collins’ The Hunger Games, in 2010 it was Riordan’s Percy Jackson and Marr’s Wicked Lovely series and, in 2011 it was Meyer’s Bloody Jack series. Yes, they’re all YA novels, but hey, I’m a teen, and I need something to fangirl about online.)

I need to read more Green and Marr (for YA, because I can never let it go.), Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye for the classics, and I’m thinking of reading Divergent and Insurgent – yes, dystopian fiction again. I also want to read Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close and Madeline Miller’s The Song of Achilles, because I feel I should read something more… serious.

Problem is, I have no money. And I think I have no time as well, even with the long Christmas break.

I need to feed my mind with something more than candy fiction.

On Alaska and Envelopes

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

I don’t really have time to make a proper book review (If you could consider ze other posts “proper”),  but I’m just writing these down in case I decide to make a more well-thought-of post.

On John Green’s Looking for Alaska

It’s an amazing book. One of the most well-written YA novels I’ve read in a long time. I get what the hype is all about, though I’m not exactly going to fangirl about it (like what I did with The Hunger Games series or the Bloody Jack series – read fanfiction, lurk in boards).

The characters reminded me a lot of Stephen Chbosky’s The Perks of Being a Wallflower.  Miles’ situation was similar to Charlie’s. Both were a bit… inexperienced at the beginning of the novels, but thanks to new friends, they get to come out of their shell – for a lack of a better word. Sam and Alaska as the heroines and love interests are freakily alike. Broken and beautiful is what I’d call them. Sam is/was dating an older guy, has a hipster like tendency (with her taste in music), used to be promiscuous, used to take drugs. Alaska is/was dating an older guy, has a hipster like tendency (with her taste in literature), said to be addicted to sex, likes to drink and smoke a lot. (Un) coincidentally, the main protagonists of the novels are quite smitten with them.

I liked how the characters in the novel were flawed. They were an interesting bunch, and seemed so very… ‘real.’ I admire Miles/Pudge’s  ambition of seeking a “Great Perhaps”. Again, it was similar to Charlie’s wish to be more outgoing. (Though Charlie is a whole lot more insightful than Miles.) I’m not really comfortable with character deaths, but I like how this novel dealt with loss and mourning.

Lots of quotable quotes, but my favorite is:

“You spend your whole life stuck in the labyrinth, thinking about how you’ll escape it one day, and how awesome it will be, and imagining that future keeps you going, but you never do it. you just use the future to escape the present.” – Alaska

I enjoyed this book, and I think I’m going to enjoy more of John Green’s novels. My next would probably be “Paper Towns”.

On Maureen Johnson’s 13 Little Blue Envelopes

I ordered this book on Book Depository and it took me months before it got delivered (it got lost in the mail). It arrived on the day I just finished reading Alaska, and I was excited to read this after ze long wait.

I didn’t meet my expectations though.

I’ve always liked the idea of travelling across Europe. Ginny, the protagonist of the story, received a bunch of blue envelopes from her recently deceased artist aunt who sends her on this European escapade. But the so-called journey reminded me of a quest from Glitch, an RPG: mechanical.

I didn’t like the main character, and given that it was written from her perspective (third person though. Maybe that’s one of the reasons why as a reader, I felt detached from her) I was disappointed on how this journey went. She was pretty boring character, she said so herself. She relies on her Aunt Peg (the one who sent the envelopes) to make her more interesting and louder. I thought that was the intention of her Aunt as well – though her niece didn’t deliver.

Yes, she followed instructions. But that was the point. She did everything that was expected, as if she were a robot. She waited for things to happen – until the last page. I don’t know if the character was still in mourning, but it felt like she wasn’t having fun, travelling around Europe. I get that she was shy, but being shy didn’t mean being stoic. It was as if she wasn’t really “experiencing” when she was travelling. The only time I saw her lively was when she was emailing her friend about a boy, Keith. Now he was an interesting character, and so I partly don’t get how he was attracted to ‘bland’ Ginny.

I also don’t understand how she could’ve attracted traveling companions with that personality. Mary Sue, perhaps?

Maybe I’m being too harsh, but I was really disappointed in this book. The plot was interesting! But the way the main character reacted (or a lack of reaction thereof) to what was going around her (again, waiting for things to happen to her) was incredibly annoying.

Or maybe after reading Green, my standards were too high.

(Then again, Green and Johnson have a book together(ish), so we’ll see.)

The Final Fowl Play

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Another remarkable Young Adult series ends after 11 years. Aside from Harry Potter, the Artemis Fowl series is just one of the few novels I truly grew up reading (and collecting.) I remember when my parents bought me the books – a collection of the first three - it was summer and as per custom, Mom, Ally and I spent it at Dubai with Dad. Mom spotted an ad in the newspaper of a book sale – a bazaar really – which would take place near the Church close to where we stayed. Naturally, we went – since Mom and I are book lovers and she could never miss out on a sale, no matter where she is.

There was something… wicked in the way I acquired the books. I saw it on top of a cart, which I initially thought was used as storage container rather than a shopping basket because it was piled to the brim and left in an obtrusive part of the bazaar. I saw the three books – a boxed set – on the top, priced for a mere 30 Dirhams – that’s about 450 Pesos only. And considering that one book, a YA novel at that, would cost at about P300 at the cheapest, I knew I had quite a find – or literally, as my Dad and I found out after paying, a steal. Because as the saleslady was packing our purchase, my Dad and I overheard the lady beside us complaining to the cashier that she had reserved a boxed set of the – you guessed it – Artemis Fowl books. Oops. What’s good is that they never found out we bought it – but even if they did, well, I had the receipt of purchase.

It was a stroke of luck that the books “came to me.”

What I love about this series is that it mixed fantasy and faery lore with technology and kick-ass saving-the-world plans (or conspiracies) – an amalgamation of old fantasy and science fiction. I always thought it was ingenious the way Colfer invented (or reinvented) terms such as the LEPRecon and mesmer, or how he  designed the People as being more technologically advanced compared to humans, but still retain magic and old traditions and are environmentally-conscious as well. The plot is ingenious, really, and combined with unforgettable characters and winning lines, it’s a sure hit with me.

Last Wednesday night, after a session of mind-boggling analysis (that of which will not be discussed in this blog), I finished reading the last book of the Artemis Fowl Series: Artemis Fowl and the Last Guardian. Like the previous books, it was one that you simply can’t put down. Fast-paced and action-packed with a scattering of humor and witty lines and the overly detailed description of various technologies used by the fairies, the final book is brimming to the core with the best of Eoin Colfer’s writing and imagination. The time duration of the book spans only to a few hours and so every page is jam-packed with adrenaline rush moments succeeding a cunning (though in this case, last minute) master plan.

Artemis, Holly and Butler, together with Foaly and Mulch, try to save the day again in this novel. The fate of the entire human race depends on them stopping Opal Koboi from opening the second lock which would destroy all the humans and supposedly keep the People “safe” – though at the moment, they are facing a crisis of their own thanks to her. Opal’s new henchmen turn out to be the Berserkers, fairy warriors who sacrificed themselves during the last battle between humans and the People. The stage for this story is in the grounds of the Fowl Manor, and some of the souls of the Berserkers occupy the bodies of Juliet, Myles and Beckett. With limited time, weaponry and considering the gravity and finality of the situation, Artemis Fowl may have just reached his limit.

Artemis had often told his little brother that intelligence will always win out in the end, and there was nobody more intelligent than Artemis.

Unfortunately, after the events of the past six hours, Artemis did not have the same faith in his own maxim that he used to. And, as Myles told his story, Artemis began to believe that even his intelligence would not be enough to forge a happy ending from the mess they were mired in.

Perhaps we can win, he thought. But there will be no happy ending.

To be honest, I was quite a bit disappointed with the ending of book. Although I admit I enjoyed reading it because it reminded me of the things that I love about this series, but as it is the final book, I had have higher expectations of it. I thought it wasn’t the best book in the series (the last novels usually aren’t) but because of the way it ended, I was disappointed.


I love the characters in this novel because all of them are fresh and unique and unlike the stereotypical characters in YA novels. Holly is one of the best female protagonists I’ve ever encountered and I love that Colfer has made her so bad ass without expounding on her “hotness” or making all male characters fall in love with her – granted that this is not a romance novel but still! Butler is unlike any “bodyguard” I’ve read about because for once, the guardian has a personality and does not remaining stoic. Foaly is no ordinary erm… computer technician. He’s a smart-ass with a heroic streak which we finally see beyond his control room this time around. Mulch Diggums is the court jester of the series and I’m glad to see him acquire new strengths in this novel. What I like about Colfer is that he gives even his supporting characters “exposure time” in this novel and throughout the series, they develop as much as the protagonist changes.

There are two minor characters who stole the show though. They’re the adorable twins, Myles and Beckett Fowl. I will always have a soft spot for younger brothers (at least 7 years old and below!) in novels and in real life. Myles is like a mini-Artemis Fowl, though I doubt he would undergo a criminal-phase, and Beckett, the “simple-toon” is the unruly and energetic Fowl twin. I love how their personalities shine – though briefly because for the most part of the book, they were inhabited by a Berserker – even with minor roles to play.

“Artemis! Get me out of here!” he ordered. “These are my favorite loafers!”

Artemis smiled. His little brother was back in control of his own mind.

Myles would not speak until he had cleaned his shoes with a wet wipe. “That fairy ran through the mud in my shoes,” he complained, sipping a second glass of acai juice. “These are kidskin shoes, Arty.”

“He’s quite precocious, n’est-ce pas?” Artemis whispered from the side of his mouth.

“Look who’s talking, plume de ma tante,” Butler whispered right back at him.

Couldn’t have said it better myself, Butler.

Opal spread her arms wide, allowing the black magic to pulse in orange cables along her limbs. “Are you not terrified, boy?”

Beckett hopped monkeylike into his version of a ninja pose. “Nope. You should be terror-fied.”

“Me?” said Opal, laughing. “You cannot harm me. The fairy bonds prevent it.”

Beckett punched Opal in the stomach, from the shoulder like Butler had taught him. “Oh yeah. I’m pretty fast. Faster than your stupid fairy bonds. Butler says I’m a natch-u-ral.”

Opal’s breath left her in a huff and she stumbled backward, cracking her elbow on the Berserker Gate’s raised dais. Luckily for her, the fairy bonds kicked in and Oro reclaimed control of the body; otherwise four-year-old Beckett Fowl might have put an end to Opal’s world domination plans right there.

As for the protagonist, Artemis Fowl the Second, it’s apparent that the juvenile criminal mastermind has truly changed since the beginning of the series. Artemis has evolved from an antihero in the first novel to a, dare I say it, martyr in the final one which I truly thought was an apt role for the child genius. He is an extremely complex character, and not because of  his high intellect or that of his recent Atlantis Complex, because, in words similar to Foaly’s I still don’t know what makes this guy tick. Aside from finding the good in him, Artemis remains to be a proud know-it-all with two left feet. His smart comebacks, though lacking in malice, hasn’t changed and for that I am grateful – he hasn’t turned into a wimp. Artemis has just become more compassionate.

In this novel, however, I was staggered to find out Artemis Fowl’s weakness. Must be because at that time, I was already at 3/4 of the novel and things were looking… hopeless.

Holly saw that her words were not penetrating Artemis’s skull, and she realized that Artemis had two major weaknesses: One, he was physically hamstrung not only by his hamstrings but also by a lack of coordination that would have embarrassed a four-year-old; and two, he was so confident in the superiority of his own intellect that he rarely developed a plan B. If plan A proved to be a dud, there was no fallback.

Like now.

Then I thought it would be impossible for Colfer to end the novel with the triumph of “evil.” As Artemis began formulating a last minute plan – which includes sacrificing his own life – I began to wonder if he will truly die. The saving the world part, that I was sure of. As for Artemis surviving or outwitting the situation, that I wasn’t sure. I really really believed he would die.

In the last few moments before the big shebang, Colfer gave us this Arty-Holly moment.

“Please, Arty,” she mumbled. “Let me…” but she said no more as her lips had turned to slack rubber.

Artemis nearly broke—she could see it in his mismatched eyes, one human, one fairy—but then he stepped away from the couch and breathed deeply.

“No. It has to be me, Holly. If the second lock is opened, then I will die, but if my plan succeeds, then all fairy souls inside the magical corona will be drawn to the afterlife. Fairy souls. My soul is human, Holly, don’t you see? I don’t intend to die, and there is a chance that I may survive. A small chance, granted. But a chance nonetheless.” Artemis rubbed his eye with a knuckle. “As a plan, it is far from perfect, but there is no alternative.”

Artemis made Holly comfortable with cushions. “I want you to know, my dear friend, that without you, I would not be the person I am today.” He leaned in close and whispered, “I was a broken boy, and you fixed me. Thank you.”

I admit, with what has happened in The Time Paradox and a bit in The Atlantis Complex, I shipped them. But I also knew it was impossible, really. Another great development in this series is Artemis and Holly’s friendship – you only see that kind of love in a few YA books.

The plot was fast paced, but I didn’t like that the first half of the adventure with Artemis, Holly and Butler in transit while Opal prepared for the attacks above ground. There were scatterings of humor, like when Butler and Artemis get into a bit of a squabble because Artemis wasn’t doing as he promised, and unanticipated tales, like Holly’s disaster dates with Trouble, Mulch rediscovering with his ancestors’ past and Foaly and Caballine’s story. The twist the ending – not in the ‘outwitting’ plot since it was quite obvious what Artemis had in mind for his “last stand” – was one that I did not expect but welcomed, of course. In fact, now that I am writing about it, there’s only one big reason why I was disappointed in this book.

The ending.

Why? It lacked an epilogue!

Although it was a nice touch that Colfer ends the book with Holly narrating Artemis’ story with the starting passages from the first novel, I didn’t like it that on the last page, Artemis is… vulnerable. He had forgotten, or was still in the process of remembering what had happened. I didn’t like it. And though Holly, Butler and Foaly were present in the ending, I also wanted to see Mulch, No. 1, Juliet and the twins. I thought that it was just as important that they be there during that moment (Especially Mulch!)

The book concluded with a drastic technological change for both human and fairy. I wondered how all of them fared, and how Artemis adapted to it all.. I wanted to know if and how Artemis kept in touch with the People, especially with Holly, Foaly and Mulch. I wanted to know if  his parents knew of the existence of fairies, and of his history with them. I wanted to know how they lived the rest of their lives, assumingly in peace.

I was sad to see the series end. But I was even more depressed when given that unsatisfying ending. I need more of Artemis Fowl! And for that, I guess I’d have to resort to rereading the books from the beginning or fanfiction.

Because it’s not so often you read about an extraordinary boy genius (but I guess the two left feet is stereotypical) and his faery friends (who are more technologically advanced than modern humans)  fighting to save the world.

… or even less when the hero starts off as a criminal mastermind.

More than just something to dance to // Mistaken Candy Fiction

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Why are the ones

who need the

most shelter

always the ones

left out

in the rain?

A few days ago, a friend and I were at a bookshop inside the university. She was looking for a book, a ‘light reading’, and she picked up Bernhard Schlink’s The Reader. I gawked at her, my reaction instantaneous. I haven’t read the book but I have seen parts of the movie, and from that, I could tell that “The Reader” was not light reading at all. But then again, that’s just me. And my choices in books aren’t always so… “healthy.”

My friend asked me what I considered light reading, so I picked up a copy of Meg Cabot’s “Size 12 is Not Fat”, and proclaimed that this was Candy Fiction. The usual, contemporary fiction that tackles everyday problems and mysteries (as common as those problems can be) and is basically, ordinary life that’s sugar-coated. You don’t usually learn anything new from Candy Fiction. The prose is readable, not poetic. The plot is fairly simple and can be predictable. And the characters are just your Average Joe. Nothing new, nothing special, but for some reason, they’re entertaining to read. Candy, a sweet treat but totally devoid of nutrients.

Meg Cabot is my main source of Candy Fiction, and so are other YA novelists I grew up reading. Don’t misunderstand me, I love Meg Cabot. She is seriously one of my most favorite authors of all time and I would never tire of reading her novels. I actually have a lot of respect for her because I think she’s one of the classiest Candy Fiction authors out there – all because of the twists in her novels ( the Witty “Aww”1 or “I should have seen it coming” moments) and kick-ass  female protagonists that I remember better than her drool-worthy male counterparts. But in the end, well, it’s not a work by J.K. Rowling or Diana Wynne Jones, is it? Her books changed my life (the first YA novel I read was probably Princess Diaries) gradually, but it didn’t rock my universe the way other books/authors have.

Last Saturday, I downloaded an e-book called “How to Kill a Rockstar” by Tiffanie DeBartolo. I thought, from the title, cover and synopsis, that this was another Candy Fiction – more on the lines of Rachel Hawthorne than Meg Cabot. I started reading it Friday night. The first few pages confirmed my initial judgment – girl with a tragic past comes to live with an eccentric, passionate, trying to make it big “rockstar”2 and they become attracted to each other. It seemed okay enough. And remember I was looking for something sweet, and not philosophical.

And for a moment it was. And then, gradually and unexpectedly, it changed. The talks didn’t just center on the desire to be famous, it also focused on the loss of culture and originality, on the homogeneity of the public and lack of good taste. One of the main themes of the novel was the line between being popular and being legendary. Paul Hudson wants to make it big. He wants his music to move people and change a generation, just like his idol Doug Blackman changed his life, and so did Eliza Caelum’s. Problem is, the general public, the “musical heathens and soulless pop pagans”, wants pop – mainstream music for entertainment, something to just dance to. And he doesn’t want to give in. He shouldn’t.

Winkle called me a moron, which I granted him, but then he had the nerve to accuse me of having no ambition and that’s when I lost it. Hell, I’ve been working my ass off for a decade. I sleep what I do, I eat what I do, I dream what I do, I live what I do.

I told Winkle what he didn’t understand was that my ambition, I’ve come to realize, doesn’t go beyond the music, and he said: “Well, it has to. This is a business, Paul. Not a hobby. Not a religion. It’s a fucking industry.” Know what? For the first time I actually saw where Winkle was coming from. But he and I live on separate islands, there’s a stormy sea between us, and we have no boats to get us across.

A call from Feldman followed shortly after my conversation with Winkle ended. Feldman tried to convince me that the debate between art versus commerce is archaic and stupid. He said the key is to learn how to bend but not to break. Good advice if you’re Stretch Armstrong, but I’ve always been more of a Humpty-Dumpty kind of guy—hard shell, soft and mushy on the inside, liable to roll off the wall and crack into a zillion pieces beyond repair.

And let’s face it: this mess goes way beyond Paul Hudson and Bananafish. Way beyond art versus commerce. A guy doesn’t need Loring Blackman’s magna goddamn cum laude Ivy League degree to understand that what most people call capitalism is actually greed, and the whole country is going to hell because of it. I’ve seen it with my own goddamn eyes.

No kidding, it’s spawned something of a cultural awareness in me. Or lack thereof, as the case may be. I’ve spent the last three and a half months traveling across America with my eyes pricked open, looking for a goddamn culture, looking for some meaning. But all I see are truck stops and golden arches and Big Gulps and a lot of little dreams crushed by big powerful men behind big desks.

 Maybe that is the culture. Maybe it’s supposed to make me proud to be an American, but all it makes me feel is positive we’re doing something wrong.

Because nowadays, it’s hard to want to make it big and not conform with the world.

This novel also tackles on loss, on redemption of the “soul”, and of the power of music. Power of music. Power, a cliché word in itself. But after reading this novel, I’ve developed a respect for the people who are truly moved by music. Not those who throw the saying “Music Moves My Soul” so carelessly, but those who actually live it.

I used to think that the people who hate mainstream music are just a tad bit dramatic. Sure it can be annoying when one raves over Justin Beiber and doesn’t know who the hell Elton John is. But after reading this novel, I think it’s clearer to me now.

The artists who need the most shelter always seem to be the ones who get left out in the rain

It’s about the loss of appreciation of something timeless because we are bombarded with, dare I say it, Candy Music.

I’ve been so naïve and judgmental to classify this novel as Candy Fiction when, ironically, its message was the opposite: discern, have taste and dare to not conform.

There are things we never tell anyone. We want to but we can’t. So we write them down. Or we paint them. Or we sing about them. Maybe we carve them into stone. Because that’s what art is. It’s our only option. To remember. To attempt to discover the truth. Sometimes we do it to stay alive. These things, they live inside of us. They are the secrets we stash in our pockets and the weapons we carry like guns across our backs. And in the end we have to decide for ourselves when these things are worth fighting for, and when it’s time to throw in the towel. Sometimes a person has to die in order to live.

No Candy Fiction novel would possess these perfect words. The new, and at the moment, most apt classification I could give this book is: A book that inspired me to write a review about. Because I have to be honest, it takes a lot of, I don’t know, X-factor probably, for me to put-off procrastination and actually take time to contemplate and write. And now I know no review can do it justice.

I want to write about how I underestimated Paul and Eliza’s romance. The one that I thought was a usual “He’s cute, She’s cute, We have something in common so let’s fall deeply madly in love” type of drama was actually this:

I am of the theory that all of our transcendental connections, anything we’re drawn to, be it a person, a song, a painting on a wall—they’re magnetic. The art is the alloy, so to speak. And our souls are equipped with whatever properties are required to attract that alloy. I’m no scientist so I don’t really know what the hell these properties are, but my point is we’re drawn to stuff that we’ve already got a connection to.

Part of the thing is already inside of us.

That’s what I mean when I say fate. Fate is the magnetic pull of our souls toward the people, places, and things we belong with.

I want to write about how I, we, shouldn’t let titles fool us. Don’t judge a book by its title OR its cover. Don’t let the title fool you of its seemingly trivial and conventional nature (A romance with a Rockstar, how many stories I’ve read about that.) An infrequently used word as the title of a novel, chosen to render eloquence can turn out to spell “C-R-A-P” after all. And I guess I should have pondered more on the title, for though this book isn’t superficial, sometimes what we read is what we get, but the twists of the plot still surprises us at the end. 3

And lastly, I want to write how relevant this book was, or is. And not just because of the recent deaths of music icons. Yesterday, I remember telling my Tita that I didn’t like watching ASAP or Party Pilipinas… or any mainstream, local show and/or movie. I couldn’t exactly pinpoint my distaste, but now I realize it was because it’s too common, too formulaic. I called it “trying hard to be Western” and “everyone, every artist, is the same – the way they dress, the looks, their “personality”, it’s all the same to me.” And I know a lot of people I know would disagree on me about that, but that’s how I feel, and if it isn’t mainstream, if it’s an unpopular opinion, then so be it.

Because after reading this novel, I realized I never want to be a Jill Bishop. Or anything remotely close to it.

Her name’s Jill Bishop and she is completely devoid of any principles. She thinks life is too short not to smoke. She thinks the reason music exists is solely for entertainment. She thinks Starbucks invented coffee. She thinks only nerds read books. She doesn’t know the words to any song released prior to 1980—incidentally, the year of her birth. And her mismatched bras and underwear look like they came from the goddamn lost-and-found.

And in the end, the heart of this novel is:

Art & Love:

The Only Things

That Can Bring

a Person Back

to Life


1 Read the conclusion/confession scene in Jinxed and you’ll get what I mean.

2 “Is he cute?” I asked her.

“Cute? If you like the dysfunctional lunatic, male-slut vibe, sure.”

Clearly, a shallow description. Cute, but superficial-sounding. A convo you’d imagine to find in a rom-com.

3 Ironically, I put Edwin McCain’s I’ll Be on repeat (the only song I could think of that is halfway related to the story) to block out the sounds of the TV below. Glee was playing.

Image sources: [X] [X]

Untitled and Unwritten

Tags

, ,

Originally posted on Tumblr.

Here’s the thing: I’m lazy. And that is a truth I’ve been denying for a long time.

Honestly, I think I’m creative. And I say that in the most honest and least arrogant way possible. I think we all are, actually. I believe in the so-called naive way of thinking that all of us were born with the potential to be great. Like what Picasso said (which I have a statement shirt of, a bit ironically),“Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up.”And that’s the story of a lot of people, in a nutshell.

I love reading. But sometimes, what I read in books is not enough. The adventure is not enough. The characters are missing something. The ending was not as promising as the beginning. My head is filled with different scenarios and ideas that I would want to read, that maybe, I should write. But I was- I am lazy. And I’ve called this laziness “Writer’s Block”.

Writing used to come as easy as reading. The first “story” I have written was all full of dialogue. I was in the fourth grade when I had written it, and continued writing this story till I was in the 6th, when I had abandoned it to write for an “audience”. Two words: Fan fiction.

The story I had written played out in my head like a TV series (or an Anime series to be more precise) with a lot of “seasons”. I had managed to fill dozens of notebooks (of which I’ve hidden in the deepest corners of my room) with it. When I reread some of these writings last year (struck by a peculiar need to try to sort out my room), I realized how bad it was.

The grammar (and my handwriting) was atrocious. The main character was definitely a Mary Sue (something I learned from fan fiction.) and the supporting characters were bland. The plot was inconsistent and the dialogue can either be too dramatic, too cheesy and/or trying hard to be humorous.

But despite all that, I think my 10-year-old self was a much better writer than I am now. For one, she was actually able to produce something. Put ideas into words and daydreams into descriptive scenarios. And with time, patience and a lot of practice, my 10-year-old self would outgrow all of my negative comments and write all the bad writing away, till there is nothing left but good writing. (Neil Gaiman once said that, I think.)

As for my writing now, well, I haven’t practiced, have I? And my pen(cil) needs a lot of sharpening to do. My writing has probably grown worse over the years. And the only thing I can write now are research papers, most likely.

That’s not a bad thing, but it’s not a creative output, is it?

A year ago, during my Journalism 101 class, we were asked to write a feature story  about one of our classmates. It’s been a year since I’ve written a features article, and I wasn’t so confident in my ability than I had been in my Senior year of high school when I was the Features editor of the school paper. But I just let the words flow, and it had been surprsingly easy because I was forced to write. My grades depended on it.

I started my article with a visual narrative of stereotypes. Just simple sentences depicting random scenes of an outsider. And the rest of the article was writing from facts. And what do you know, my classmates and professors liked it. Sure there had to be a lot of polishing to do, but they’ve particularly praised my lead. They said it was a vivid description, and that they could see clearly what I’ve wanted to portray in words.

I was ecstatic.

But sadly, I haven’t written any sort of descriptive/narrative prose since then.

I blamed it on schoolwork, org duties and “writer’s block”. But I didn’t blame it on myself, on my lack of focus, discipline and resolve.

When I was young, I’ll admit I never imagined writing as a career. Writing was my escape, my favorite pastime, and, if it still applies today, my talent. One that I’ve forgotten to hone.

I didn’t develop skills in drawing, playing instruments, or athletics. But I don’t want to lose my writing. I don’t want to outgrow it. I want to be a writer.

So, like an alcoholic going to therapy, I say: “Hi, I’m Annick. And I’m a lazy writer.” Because admitting is the first step to recovery.

All about the ineffable plan [ Good Omens ]

Tags

, , , , ,

It’s a known speculation that the world will end on December 21, 2012. I’ve read somewhere that the “monsters” people create at a certain time, come from the fear of the public during a crisis. No wonder we’re bombarded with apocalyptic movies and dystopian fiction: we have taken advantage of the world and now, we’re paying for it. Global warming, tsunamis, typhoons, even poverty and growing tension between countries – we’ve been so focused on living the “easy” life  that we’ve abused those around us. All these things lead to destruction, end of the world or not.

With all of these apocalyptic hysteria, I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to read Good Omens just this year. I’ve been looking for this book since last year (maybe even before) but it wasn’t available in any of the bookstores I’ve checked. Nonetheless, in a typical summer day, I spotted this copy at the bookstore in the AS. And although I already have books to read for the summer, I knew I just couldn’t let this book pass.

And good thing I didn’t. It was fantastic and  just bloody brilliant.

Timely too.


Good Omens is about the coming of the end of the world. Aziraphale, one of the many protagonists of the novel, sums up the plot of the book quite nicely (1):

“The Antichrist is alive on earth at this moment, Sergeant. He is bringing about Armageddon, the Day of Judgment, even if he himself does not know it. Heaven and Hell are both preparing for war, and it’s all going to be very messy.” (p. 271)

What’s great about this book, especially given this moment in time, is that it’s a parody of the apocalypse, a breather from all the doom and destruction in media nowadays. Though this book is about the Armageddon, the epic battle between good and evil and what not, from the title, it can already be deduced that this book gives a different perspective from the Bible’s Revelations or the movie, The Omen. For one, the book shows that the contrast between good and evil is not simply black and white: it’s gray, which is, more often than not, the truth.

This is shown by the unlikely pair, Aziraphale, “an angel and part-time rare book dealer”, and Crowley, “an angel who did not much as fall as saunter vaguely downwards”. They first appear In the Beginning…, when Aziraphale was an angel of Eden and Crowley (or Crawley, as he was known back then) was the serpent that tempted Adam and Eve. The pair had, inevitably, bonded since then and shared common interests, such as their their love of material things (2), their contentment of the state of the world and refusal of the apocalypse - of which both had certain roles to fulfill with regards to the Antichrist. But due to unforeseen circumstances (3), a switch has been made that causes changes in the so-called “ineffable plan.”

Good Omens’ version of the Antichrist is also quite different. Adam Young grew up as a regular human (4). His character has got to be one of the most memorable ones I’ve ever encountered. A part of it is because he is the antichrist, but I also thought he (and his friends) has a different way of thinking – sort of a cross between childhood innocence and wisdom.

“Funny, reely,” he [Brian] said. “You spend your whole life goin’ to school and learnin’ stuff, and they never tell you about stuff like the Bermuda Triangle and UFOs and all these Old Masters running around the inside of the Earth. Why do we have to learn boring stuff when there’s all this brilliant stuff we could be learnin’, that’s what I want to know.” (p. 153)

Something was happening inside his head. It was aching. Thoughts were arriving there without him having to think them. Something was saying, You can do something, Adam Young. You can make it all better. You can do anything you want. And what was saying this to him was… him. Part of him, deep down. Part of him that had been attached to him all these years and not really noticed, like a shadow. It was saying: yes, it’s a rotten world. It could have been great. But not it’s rotten, and it’s time to do something about it. That’s what you’re here for. To make it all better. (p. 200)

“It’s like you said the other day,” said Adam. “You grow up readin’ about pirates and cowboys and spacemen and stuff, and jus’ when you think the world’s all full of amazin’ things, they tell you it’s really all dead whales and chopped-down forests and nuclear waste hangin’ about for millions of years. ‘Snot worth growin’ up for, if you ask my opinion.” (p. 201)

Like what I believe, the driving force for every action or decision, in this book, is love. Love for self, love for perfection, love for the Earth and things that still can be. In Good Omens, the antichrist came to realize how much he values the world, in all its imperfection. Although Adam is initially struck by the idea that you must destroy everything to create something new and perfect, the end of the world all boils down to his decision – whether he will stick with what is and change it himself, or destroy everything and supposedly, start anew.

Good Omens is an adventure. Not because it narrates the last few days before the apocalypse, but because it shows you different lives and perspectives. It’s hard to pinpoint the main protagonist in this story, because simply, everyone has an important role to play. The POV jumps from one character to the other, not in an identifiable pattern but they appear just when they are required in the story. Some, you may even consider irrelevant at the beginning but will turn out to be the harbingers of doom (5). Though the sudden shifts in viewpoints may seem confusing at first, Gaiman and Pratchett have made very memorable and distinct characters (6) whose personalities mesh so well, their unexpected  meeting (7) at the finale is like combining pieces of a puzzle – they were meant to fulfill their functions in the “ineffable plan”, which they did satisfactorily, that you can’t help but marvel at the arrangement of it all (8).

I really enjoyed reading this book. The characters are unforgettable and the plot, with its twists and turns and references and footnotes (9), is unparalleled. Simply put, Good Omens is epic in so many ways. And even though I don’t believe the world will end just yet, I agree with Adam when he said:

Something told him that something was coming to an end. Not the world, exactly. Just the summer. There would be other summers, but there would never be one like this. Ever again.

Better make the most out of it, then. (p. 365)


(1) Nice, meaning precisely correct.

(2) The former with first edition books, the later with gadgets

(3) Agnes Nutter exempted, of course.

(4) And so is his satanical hellhound, Dog.

(5) The four apocalyptic horsepersons who were first portrayed as “regular”, evil characters.

(6) I am unable to sort which are supposedly the supporting characters.

(7) Again, unexpected except for Agnes Nutter.

(8) “Unintended teamwork” at its finest.

(9) Yes. I’m making these footnotes in allusion to the book.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 442 other followers